dialogue or armed struggle? 2
Anonymous User wrote on 29.11.2007 18:42 clock: "Why is the forum not headline dialogue Bewaffnetder fight."
Answer: Both versions contain would be possible, however, have its pitfalls, because dialogue includes military is not and vice versa Military should not rule out the dialogue.
at the Military I make the claim, that it is not a matter of justice, but is subordinated to the law, a law which is democratic legitimacy and human rights.
to such legitimacy is lacking on the part of the PKK's actions, but also on the part of the actions of the Turkish military.
to the dialogue I present the claim that he is not exhausted by propaganda, but negotiated the mutual interests.
Since the Turkish military and the PKK are under no democratic legitimacy would be the negotiations while not insignificant, but the actual negotiation obligation rests with the Turkish government and Kurdish opposition parties. As long as those most responsible
their bargaining obligations not comply, leave it to the "armed struggle" and the Militrärischen the political initiative. - And that's wrong.
-msr-
0 comments:
Post a Comment