northern Iraq vs. Turkey? debate in the Forum of weltexpress.de
Certainly there is no Kurdish government in northern Iraq if the war against Saddam Hussein would be absent, the first and second, because before them between Baghdad was largely stripped of power in northern Iraq.
But still I believe it is wrong, Write to the Kurdish government in northern Iraq of "US-backed" because this government was elected immerhinh. And how can that be of interest to ignore it. I do not understand.
top of that absurd if the recent PKK propaganda now railed to anti-imperialist and against the United States, for all separately's Kurds, whether in northern Iraq, Turkey or Iran, were before the Iraq war did not mobilize against the U.S. invasion . Instead, there was also the PKK a mood to Motto: ". No matter what happens with Iraq, mainly the northern Iraq Kurdish" So, no, "Ami stay home!" No, the change in the PKK's propaganda came only when their false expectations were disappointed that the northern Iraqi Kurdistan would expand into Turkey. In contrast, the northern Iraqi Kurds were glad of the achievements and make your way around, that everything is risked when the PKK in Turkey over again provides pretexts for military action and riskiet achievements. Moreover, with a largely futile ambitions, because it "victorious", the PKK may be present in their skirmishes against the Turkish military in the world also, it is about the only blood spilled beyond propaganda and will change at the borders of Turkey, nothing.
I think it is irresponsible to demand that the parties other than the unarmed dispute resolution through a democratic Process, because if you die there? Young people who are slaughtering packed in uniform today. And for what? The flags on government buildings? Nationalism, whether or Ottoman Kurdish worth a single human life. You will not have enough of it - and certainly no fatalities. Except that you at any of their "national day commemorates. This is not a recommendation. Or has someone for me a number, how many lives to achieve nationalist goals should be worth?
What should go instead? But clearly it that the Kurds in Turkey, Iraq, Syria and Iran have the right to their cultural identity and possible complete. But it comes with a "separate state"? Much more sensible is to require the States concerned that they first be multicultural and 2 the existing borders of the region open so that it has with the separation of the Kurds to an end. That would be progressive policies. Everything else is botched and a kind of Monopoly Ehtnien to which no one should engage sollte.Überhaupt all be because the region politically and economically be to some, because the dam projects in Turkey and the Kurdish conflict can escalate into international conflicts. Who can do? Much more sensible is to require a policy in which the Kurds those States to be bridges rather than the whole Region against one another to incite.
So much for the remote region of conflict, but it is advisable to just visit a school in Berlin or Frankfurt and then to consult with Turkish and Kurdish kids about the Kurdish conflict. They were still in our infancy fine with each other, the stress is not enough if they get by some idiot, the nationalist idea in his head.
What makes the kids? That they want to be proud of? And disdain for the other? How, then, is our recommendation? But precisely this mutual degradation is the result of which, if not multi-culturalism is urged, but lower descent instincts are addressed. Then they make "Ready" when they have nothing in common - each other except contempt.
"For the recognition of a national state of the Kurds" - for my sake, but only if it would make peace. Or is there anyone here who would have been through war for the reunification of "brothers and sisters" from East and West Germany? Horst-Udo S.
calls that the northern Iraqi Kurds' fight their brothers and sisters in Turkey for a separate nation state. "With
Horst-Udo S. but unfortunately no one can survive such a war, nor guarantee that the Kurds now have more than at the end. The idea that It could end up less or nothing more to come warmongers never really unless there are provocateurs of the "other side". This is a problem of all war-mongering and battlefields that one "friendly fire" or begins to fall for the tricks of the enemy begins, resulting in a targeted basis.
Horst-Udo S. is get over it, because it's going wrong in the distance, can be a "statement" and also quickly find the next massacre, in which 'fight at "mind can - rather than last, however, because in" peoples battles "the human right loses.
